I know that we do it; on Vine/Cordon/Indeterminate toms. However, from reading up on the topic it seems that the reason for this is because the tomato will produce far too much foliage at the expense of the fruits.
However, on all the armpits that I have potted on, and on the few that I have missed - there are fruits forming on the very next flush of leaves. ie; there is a stem, then a few leaves and in amongst it - tomato flowers.
So, it isn't producing foliage at the expense of fruit, it is just doing exactly the same as the next growth of tomato on the main stem.
So, why do we do it again?
However, on all the armpits that I have potted on, and on the few that I have missed - there are fruits forming on the very next flush of leaves. ie; there is a stem, then a few leaves and in amongst it - tomato flowers.
So, it isn't producing foliage at the expense of fruit, it is just doing exactly the same as the next growth of tomato on the main stem.
So, why do we do it again?
I relieved them of their sideshoots as recommended (I refuse to call them armpits!
) Some of them have actually turned out to be determinate and with no sideshoots left, there growth is finished!
I've been really tired and lazy this year so have grown almost all of them as bush and have just started stopping them. I haven't really seen a difference. I didn't really expect to turn it into an experiment, it was the best I could do as I didn't have time to break of all the sideshoots.


Comment