Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jaxom Mother Nature is always pregnant and we don't complain. Why does Rachel have to disappear? I would be quite happy to see a mummified lady working in the garden and then she could carry her baby in a papoose on her back.
Celebrate procreation is my vote. Another thing I can't understand is why so many people object to mothers breastfeeding in public. If Page three in a national newspaper is ok then why is a baby feeding so disturbing?
Jax |
I agree, anytime a celebrity is pregnant they cart them off, come on I grew up with the Janet Ellis debacle (sure she was pregnant, sure she was a Blue Peter presenter, sure she was unmarried, sure she was carrying Sophie Ellis Bextor but she has paid for this by having that child!). I am disgusted that in this day and age that we are unable to come to terms with women being pregnant on TV, what happens to gardeners when they become pregnant, are they not allowed to garden for nine months? I once tried to tell my sister not to decorate during her six month, she nearly killed me with a paint brush. Hormones are in flux, gardening gives back equilibrium, let her garden pregnant, she could even drop on TV....now as you can see dahlias droop and need plenty of water, oh god, oh god, my waters broken, just stay with me, to stop the droop, get a cane and plant in the soil a foot deep, what do you mean it's crowning? I've not finished yet...